Distributive Office and Processing Workers' Union, Arbitration,
1952.

Collection Number: 5124

Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives
Cornell University Library

Contact Information:
Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives
Martin P. Catherwood Library
227 Ives Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853
(607) 255-3183
kheel_center@cornell.edu
http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/library/kheel
Compiled by:
Kheel Center staff
EAD encoding:
Casey S. Westerman, June 29, 2005

© 2004 Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives, Cornell University Library


DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY

Title:
Distributive Office and Processing Workers' Union, Arbitration, 1952
Collection Number:
5124
Creator:
Cole, David L. (David Lawrence), 1902-1978.
Quantity:
0.3 linear ft.
Forms of Material:
Arbitration files.
Repository:
Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives, Martin P. Catherwood Library, Cornell University.
Abstract:
Proceedings of arbitration hearing between District 65, Distributive, Processing and Office Workers Union, and Gimbel Brothers.
Language:
Collection material in English


COLLECTION DESCRIPTION

On May 27, 1952, upon request from District 65, Distributive, Processing and Office Workers Union, the American Arbitration Association appointed David L. Cole to arbitrate the wage dispute between District 65 and Gimbel Brothers. The hearings began in New York City on July 17, 1952.
The issues in the dispute are concerned with wages (minima, progression, automatics) classifications, and changes in vacations and holidays. From February 1, 1952, when the contract came up for negotiation, until May, when Mr. Cole was called in, no agreement could be reached on the issues. Throughout this period, however, the employees remained at work. The union maintained that the wages paid at Gimbels were far below the wages paid at comparable department stores, and that these wages were insufficient in terms of the present cost of living. The union was concerned with cutting down the wage differential which existed between Gimbels and the other large department stores in the city, by attempting to force Gimbels to participate in industry-wide bargaining. The union sought a wage increase commensurate with increases in other department stores. The company claimed that its financial condition prohibited a wage increase at that time. The company also claimed that it was impossible to make wage adjustments comparable to other stores; there were too many factors which must be taken into consideration - there was no simple relationship between the various stores.

PROVENANCE

Donation

SUBJECTS

Names:
Cole, David L. (David Lawrence), 1902-1978
Distributive, Processing, and Office Workers of America. District 65
Gimbel Brothers

Subjects:
Department stores -- Employees -- New York (State) -- New York
Wages -- Clerks (Retail trade) -- New York (State) -- New York
Department stores -- Employees -- Labor unions -- New York (State) -- New York
Collective bargaining -- Clerks (Retail trade) -- New York (State) -- New York

Form and Genre Terms:
Records


INFORMATION FOR USERS

Access Restrictions:
Access to the collections in the Kheel Center is restricted. Please contact a reference archivist for access to these materials.
Restrictions on Use:
This collection must be used in keeping with the Kheel Center Information Sheet and Procedures for Document Use.
Cite As:
Distributive Office and Processing Workers' Union, Arbitration, 1952. 5124. Kheel Center for Labor-Management Documentation and Archives, Martin P. Catherwood Library, Cornell University.

COLLECTION ARRANGEMENT

Transcript arranged chronologically.